Sunday, December 30, 2007

i remember now

3) i wish i could just tape everything that i watched on tv. there is just way too much ridiculous programming on all the time. especially bill walton basketball commentary - how come there is so little of his footage on youtube?

4) my laptop is now making a strange humming sound - faint, but noticeable. i wonder if this machine will last me all through college. less than 6 months until graduation. ridiculous.

ridiculouscisms

i'm often at a loss for words these days. it seems quite difficult to convey in words many of my thoughts. anyhoo, here's some observations:

1) a quite offensive "tofu blows" segment on what apparently is another awesome FOX production: some late night show with scott feretsen. essentially it was one of those tangential skits that for a few minutes straight consisted of a very american man feigning to conduct interviews for his talk show. he pretty much just walked around to everyone at this tofu festival/fair and made fun of how disgusting tofu is, especially it being a byproduct of soybean fermentation. the end really put a nice cap to this ridiculous programming - he said something along the lines of "i love chinatown, i'm going to watch this bootlegged dvd and smoke some opium."

2) during The Eraser, starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, which was aired over TBS (many movies of which i actually enjoy very much despite, or perhaps because of, the unnecessarily longer viewing due to commericals), contained a scene midway through the movie in which some "bad guys" were attempting to get inside the building. the scene: shot from inside, two men pushing on the door, the camera angle also revealing that in fact the doors open outwards - there were push bars on the inside of the doors, meaning that the "bad guys" should have tried pulling on the doors.

3) i can't remember the other thing i was going to write about.

Friday, August 10, 2007

trifecta

the disney channel pisses me off.

poker excites me.

there is more interwoven advertising within major media channels than ever before.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

WE VALUE YOU'RE INPUT


we = the dharma seals

topic of input = http://www.thedharmaseals.com, or http://myspace.com/thedharmaseals



Wednesday, June 13, 2007

spurs game 3 win = one of the biggest flukes ever

did anyone just see game 3 of the nba finals, now with san antonio up 3-0 because of no-call on an obvious foul with just a few seconds left in the game and cleveland down 3?

- 5.5 seconds left, cavs down 72-75.
- lebron gets the inbounds to the right of the top of the key outside the three.
- lebron dribbles left.
- bruce bowen grabs and swats at lebron's right arm, and also hits him in the back.
- lebron subsequently rises up for a three-pointer at least three feet beyond the arc, even though there were still 3 seconds left and he had already gotten past bowen.
- NO FOUL WAS CALLED.
- ball goes up in the air.
- almost goes in.
- loose ball in air.
- buzzer sounds.

if you are like most people in this country and world and do not follow the NBA, you might be wondering why this matters. the problem is not just limited to the events of this game.

poor officiating has always been a part of all sports, but NBA basketball has possibly THE worst system of referring.

1) there have been consistently one-sided (i.e. clearly favorable towards one team) calls in numerous games throughout the playoffs. and many of them have involved the san antonio spurs, almost always on the good side of the refs.

from robert horry's incident (he checked steve nash with suns up 3 and under a minute left, amare stoudemire and boris diaw left the bench area and were both suspended for the following game 5, while horry sat out two games) to derek fisher's technical (manu ginobili essentially pushed himself into fisher and flopped to the ground, drawing a technical on fisher) to this most recent bullshit with bowen clearly fouling lebron (why the hell else would he have pulled up for a three from 25+ feet and with a few seconds still on the clock?!), the 2007 nba playoffs have been sourly tainted throughout some of the most important moments in games.

the suns pretty much got fucked over (note that duncan did not receive any penalty earlier for an earlier altercation that was interpreted as a non-fight, while horry's confrontational attitude was enough to classify the checking-nash incident as a fight) by something that was essentially determined by an opponent, robert horry. if a suns player had simply acted out earlier, then it would have needed to be a similar punishment for dunca, or the most appropriate call, no suspensions for duncan, stoudemire, and diaw. i thought at that point that the officiating could not possibly get any worse.

i was wrong. game 4 between the spurs and jazz was just a little bit more ridiculous, and irritating. ginobili essentially pushed himself off of fisher, which made it look like fisher had shouldered him. and now this no-call on a clear three-pointer.

2) the worst part of all is how everyone - fans, players, coaches, commentators alike - all just bend over and take it up the ass as the underhanded officiating in collaboration with the NBA corporation continues to perpetuate a officiating situation in which there is absolutely no questioning or challenging. say something bad about the referrees after the game? simple, get hit with a $10,000-$50,000 fine from the NBA. they recently started reviewing plays at the end of quarters to see if players actually get off shots before the buzzer, but that's not enough. that barely scratches the tainted surface.

if they're going to double-check time of release vs. the buzzer at the end of quarters, WHY THE FUCK IS NOT THERE ANY SORT OF REVIEW AT THE END OF GAMES - NBA FINAL GAMES AT THAT - REGARDING SHODDY OFFICIATING AND POSSIBLE NO-CALL SLIPS ON GAME-CHANGING FOULS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

as a waning fan of the NBA, this extreme level of censorship and totalitarianism is has been pissing me off for a long time and is just sad and hopeless at this point. lebron was clearly fouled - easily visible from game-time action and replays - but the depressing truth is that nothing, NOTHING, can be done about it. like all too many other things in this country and world, the cavs and everyone else disappointed with the ERRONEOUS NO-CALL can only continue to do just that: be disappointed.

3) a relevant but potentially tangential topic is also the accountability and reviewing of referring in the NBA. bob delaney, in his TWENTIETH year of officiating was the one who missed bowen's foul on lebron - who is over TWO-AND-A-HALF times younger than delaney. while watching some playoff action last month, my friend mentioned that NBA referrees essentially get tenure and then are nearly impossible to replace, which is almost exactly what ths case is. In this case, WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK??? does this man:

http://www.probasketballrefs.com/Default.aspx?tabid=85

look like someone who is among the most qualified to closely follow 48-minutes of high-paced NBA final action and be able to be on the fucking dot with calling that last several seconds of physical, decisive basketball? the answer should be a resounding, "FUCKING NO," if you've any level of common sense or visibility.

as a friend once stated in regards to the spurs' game 4 versus the jazz, "maybe Eva Longoria is fucking each referee before the game, or maybe Popovich has a dirty relationship with Stern, or maybe Duncan/Bowen has telepathic powers." either that/those, or the NBA is looking out for its longer-term interests and wants to extend the suspense of lebron' winning a championship for as long as possible. this might just be the motivation needed for the cavs to win the next four games a la the style in which the powned the detroit pistons. exactly.

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

you know how in facebook you can invite like all your friends to an event by rapidly clicking through the list? well, i just did a series of random clicking clusters, including one click which was "invite all group members to this event." and after a few minutes, i stopped because it was becoming slightly annoying and quite loud in this quiet computer lab. from the facebook event guest list page: "

Showing 666 invited guests for this event.

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

since 8:24pm tonight, i've written 36 emails. that's a lot, like 6-8 times how many i usually write each night. i think 90% of them had to do with The BIG Question. what's that you ask? this is what i say to that inquiry: http://harvard.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2251224693

vanity is vanity, for is it not vain?

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

w
h
a
t

t
h
e

f
u
c
k

i
s

h
a
p
p
e
n
i
n
g